sciences.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Non-profit, ad-free social media for social scientists. Join thousands of social scientists here and across the fediverse.

Administered by:

Server stats:

726
active users

#psychologicalscience

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Posting on behalf of my colleagues on the editorial board of JEP:HPP.

Call for Papers: Perspectives on Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Important dates:
Letter of intent submission deadline: June 15, 2024

Invited manuscript submission deadline: Sept 15, 2024

Editor:
Jelena Ristic

Background:
In 2025, the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance will celebrate its 50th birthday. This is a momentous occasion for the journal which continues to serve as a pillar of the field of experimental psychology and cognitive psychology/neuroscience. Indeed, some of the most important and pioneering findings have been published in JEP: HPP and have in many ways shaped how we think about cognition today.

To mark this occasion, in addition to invited updated reviews on several of the most cited JEP:HPP papers and perspectives of the editors, we are also inviting you, the readers, to send us your perspectives on JEP: HPP.

Details:
We are interested in receiving proposals for 1,000-word Perspective articles from JEP: HPP readers (who may also be authors) on the topic(s) of how an article, a series of articles, or general ideas published in JEP: HPPhave shaped/changed/influenced their research or academic development. We are also interested in receiving proposals on topics other than these, for instance concerning the various roles JEP: HPP can play for the next 50 years.

We aim to start publishing the Perspectives quarterly in 2025.

If you are interested in contributing a Perspective, let us know by June 15, 2024, by writing to the Associate Editor Jelena Ristic at jelena.ristic@mcgill.ca (with “Perspective proposal” in the subject line). Please include the proposed topic and a brief outline for your proposed article.

@cwts colleague Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner just published paper about peer review in psychology doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/wfs9v.

The paper presents fascinating analysis of peer review practices in terms of tension between gift-giving and accumulation. Analysis is based on case studies of three publishing outlets: #PsychologicalScience, #Collabra and @PeerCommunityIn #RegisteredReports.

Recommended reading if you're interested in #OpenScience, #OpenData, #OpenPeerReview, #Preprinting or #RegisteredReports!

osf.ioOSF

There is a call to nominate @siminevazire and @chrisdc77 as new editors for #psychologicalscience .

I was ambivalent about this proposal - I think the best researchers in the field should redirect their efforts to open publishing infrastructures, such as @pcirr (noteably, as both already do).

The old question of reform vs. revolution. Along with the EU council, I am now clearly on the "revolution" side. Maybe too much exposure to @brembs.

consilium.europa.eu/en/press/p

zenodo.org/record/7643806

1/

#PsychologicalScience (the journal) after the replication crisis.
A z-curve analysis
replicationindex.com/2022/10/2
The % of significant (p < .05, z > 2) results has not changed much (ODR = 75% vs. 71). However, the actual power to get these results has increased a lot (EDR = 21% vs. 68%). As a result, the false discovery risk has decreased from 20% to 2%.
Look out for the 2023 replicability rankings coming soon.
replicationindex.com/2022/01/2