sciences.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Non-profit, ad-free social media for social scientists. Join thousands of social scientists here and across the fediverse.

Administered by:

Server stats:

960
active users

Alfie Kohn

1/3
Literacy expert Regie Routman recalls being required to teach reading via phonics drills & worksheets - "and lots of kids were failing to learn to read successfully." But "there was nothing wrong with their ability to learn; the problem was how we were teaching them."
The beauty of the "Science of Reading" movement is that its faith in explicit phonics instruction is impervious to contrary evidence. When it fails, that just proves those kids have a learning disability and need more phonics.

2/3
Prof. Constance Weaver: “Overemphasizing phonics may be especially damaging for children who have had few experiences with books prior to school” - a caution that will ring true with good teachers (even if it eludes those holding forth far from classrooms).

"The problem with systematic & comprehensive teaching of any literacy skills is that the goal...become[s] the acquisition of the skills...instead of...fostering eager, independent, and critical students who read": radicalscholarship.com/2023/04

dr. p.l. (paul) thomas · Beyond Reading Skills: Phonics, Vocabulary, and KnowledgeWhen I entered the classroom as an English teacher in 1984 at the high school where I had graduated just five years earlier, students lugged around two huge textbooks for their English courses, one…

3/3
Want more? Start with (and share) this accessible animated video: youtu.be/wD4IRdeR0tE.
For the supporting research (i.e., the *real* science of reading), see these books and articles:

@alfiekohn
It does seem that "science" fan movements tend to be impervious to evidence